This is what I saw above my head when I left the house last week. They were really having a field day.
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Chemtrails N.J (6)
This is what I saw above my head when I left the house last week. They were really having a field day.
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Global Warming. The non-debate.
Pathetic. I expected more from RT than to simply parrot the American MSM's assertion that Climate Change scientists can only make snafus, not commit fraud.
They're approaching the "Himalayas" story as if it occurred in a vacuum. As if leaked e-mails from the University of East Anglia haven't also revealed Climate Change scientists' deliberate attempts to hide temperature declines, as if there isn't a slew of other evidence indicated wrongdoing, that should be considered along with this latest issue.
Monday, March 1, 2010
VIDEO GAMES: Anathema of the Bible Thumpers
I think if you follow the ratings your kids will generally be fine. No doubt that many games are merely military training/recruitment programs, but no one in their right mind would not let their kid play Super Mario, or Wii Tennis. The truth is video games are just another medium, like television, books, etc, that can be easily abused by those in power. This does not mean that all video games are inherently fascist brainwashing tools.
This type of brainwashing loses nearly all its power once the intended victim is aware of the trick. Rather than fighting a losing battle to censor children from this sick culture (they'll be exposed to it, whether you like it or not), I think energy would be better spent making sure kids are properly equipped with education and self confidence, in order to simply brush off such obscene and clumsy attempts at military indoctrination. Going "puritan" and attempting to plug your kid's ears and cover their eyes, will most likely have the opposite effect from the one intended.
Make sure your kids know that there are people out there who play dirty tricks like using toys to try to tell them what to think. Naivete is far more damaging than any video game could ever be.
Based on an examination of the gameplay, it's clear how the games are used, to some extent, as covert training/indoctrination tools for the youth. But when using the plot, or story inbetween the gameplay in an overwhelming majority of video games, the message is often subversive, and anti-new world order, at least in spirit. Video games have this in common with film, in that there are clearly two forces at work here: The Establishment's attempt to sink its claws into yet another public medium of communication, and the honest portion of the people (i.e the game programmers, developers who are not New World Order, and have no part in any hidden agenda) who offer, perhaps unwittingly, a counterpoint to much of the militaristic indoctrinations.
Labels:
Alan Watt,
Alex Jones,
new world order,
the military,
Video Games
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Friday, February 5, 2010
I Don't Care If You're A Shill
"Why won't any of these guys touch September Clues?" - Youtube user WearechangeN
For strategic and career reasons, most likely. Sadly, many people, even many within the "911 truth movement" are closed minded to the possibility that the aircraft that hit weren't commercial flights, and even moreso to the possibility that nothing hit, and rather it was an internal explosion. Unfortunately, until a legitimate scientific investigation takes place the evidence will most likely remain inconclusive as to exactly what occurred. But as far as Alex, he probably avoids it for the sake of his career.
If you're asking me to do my research I assure you that I have, and also that even if I haven't, your immediate assumption that I should then be considered a "shill" is all to common with you hard-line no planers. The unsatisfying truth is that we just don't know everything we need to know about 9/11 yet. Which is why those more rational members of the 9/11 truth movement wisely stay focused on all the criminality and evidence that we can currently prove.
This doesn't mean that Alex isn't dodging the issue. He quite clearly is. But when attempting to investigate a crime, it's best to start from the bottom up when building a case. In other words, much of the "no plane" evidence appears valid but must be considered as of yet inconclusive (if we're going to be adult about this) This doesn't mean to stop investigating, quite the contrary. I encourage 'no planers' to diligently continue their work until they can present a more comprehensive case, perhaps including some form of physical evidence, like a whistleblower who would have worked on the visual manipulation, or some physical evidence, like some information left over from the computers they used to perform the trickery. But until then, you guys should really stop jerking off all over the whole 9/11 truth investigation, and accusing anyone who disagrees with your "skip to the last chapter" approach to 9/11 truth of being a shill. It just comes across clownish.
For strategic and career reasons, most likely. Sadly, many people, even many within the "911 truth movement" are closed minded to the possibility that the aircraft that hit weren't commercial flights, and even moreso to the possibility that nothing hit, and rather it was an internal explosion. Unfortunately, until a legitimate scientific investigation takes place the evidence will most likely remain inconclusive as to exactly what occurred. But as far as Alex, he probably avoids it for the sake of his career.
If you're asking me to do my research I assure you that I have, and also that even if I haven't, your immediate assumption that I should then be considered a "shill" is all to common with you hard-line no planers. The unsatisfying truth is that we just don't know everything we need to know about 9/11 yet. Which is why those more rational members of the 9/11 truth movement wisely stay focused on all the criminality and evidence that we can currently prove.
This doesn't mean that Alex isn't dodging the issue. He quite clearly is. But when attempting to investigate a crime, it's best to start from the bottom up when building a case. In other words, much of the "no plane" evidence appears valid but must be considered as of yet inconclusive (if we're going to be adult about this) This doesn't mean to stop investigating, quite the contrary. I encourage 'no planers' to diligently continue their work until they can present a more comprehensive case, perhaps including some form of physical evidence, like a whistleblower who would have worked on the visual manipulation, or some physical evidence, like some information left over from the computers they used to perform the trickery. But until then, you guys should really stop jerking off all over the whole 9/11 truth investigation, and accusing anyone who disagrees with your "skip to the last chapter" approach to 9/11 truth of being a shill. It just comes across clownish.
Labels:
9/11,
9/11 Truth,
Alex Jones,
No Plane Theory,
September Clues
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)