Professional Pawns

The only thing worse than a damned fool is a professional damned fool. There are many reasons why Americans remain functionally asleep to the reality of their Globalist imposed tyranny, but one of the main ones is certainly our state of profound ignorance. Upon occasion I marvel at just how hard I had tried to become well informed by relying on mainstream sources, such as NPR and MSNBC, and just how laughably impossible that turned out to be. Before independent internet based media arrived to revive the corpse of journalism in this country, I had essentially given up any hope of receiving accurate and contextually rich information.

Had I even been aware that the many blatant discrepencies of the official explanation of 9/11 were "on the table," so to speak, in terms of discussion-worthy topics, I would've displayed a passionate interest. But the MSM, between 2001 and 2006 performed their sociological hypnotism extraordinarily well, as to repel any serious look at the event. But sometime in 2006-7, this changed. Enough of a clamor had grown, enough voices had joined in, to make the chorus of 9/11 truth just barely audible within the nooks and crannies of the internet. Simultaneously, the MSM, through increasingly lackluster attempts to coherently address our deeply rooted problems, was and still is churning out hordes of intellectually hungry discontents like myself, who inevitably gravitate toward the truth movement.

This summarizes the response that I and many others have had to a first encounter with truly independent media. There is, however, another all too common response to this hidden class of information. Some people have simply decided, perhaps subconsciously, that the acknowledgment that they've been utterly and comprehensively lied to since birth is either too frightening or too threatening to the ego to allow to occur. This is a morally hazardous choice to make because as soon as one chooses to ignore looming threats, one is volunteering themselves up as dependent of those who do choose to address these problems. This simple point is lost on many of us, who have been so effectively trained to only seriously consider the question of what to consume and when to consume it. We are meant to feel as alienated from as much of the structure of governance as possible.

This is another big barrier between many people and the horrendous reality of crimes like 9/11 and the Federal Reserve Act. To examine these crimes is to examine the true cost of our monolithically shallow consumer culture, which has captivated us like shiny objects do a baby. To admit that this is our reality is to admit that we are all sick and in need of healing. Much easier to indulge in racism, sports, and beer.

Federal Agents Are Bitter, Defeated Souls

Some Gibroney: I agree with that, but what if they had reason to believe that something was going to happenand they told everyone, once they were all there, it would be chaos. They might not have had any intel, but either way, they can't tell you what they are doing because you might be the one they are there to stop. It's only common sense. Why don't you guys go screw with the security guards at schools or grocery stores and ask them what they ae doing and see if you get any different of an answer

Some Gibroney: (in response to some other gibroney) You're right, they probably would have if it were that serious. I don't have any clue what they were doing there, maybe just a visual deterant. Who knows? But either way, they are not going to tell you because what if you are there to do harm or do research to do harm at a later date?

The Gibroney Hunter: Actually, government shills like this are usually given a cover story, at least, to regurgitate to any press that may be present. Perhaps this dude caught them by surprise and they weren't expecting any journalists to be aware of the event. People generally would not tolerate this sort of behavior from police, and they shouldn't tolerate it from spineless federal trash like that. Security guards at schools aren't Federal agents, you goddam nitwit. The New World Order feeds off idiots like you not making this distinction. You seem to be envisioning some Hollywood bullshit scenario in which these brave feds are there to catch some terrorists red handed. As if dozens of them in uniform wouldn't tip the Muslims off to their presence. When there is a bomb scare the first thing they do is evacuate. That's common knowledge. Your 'not wanting to cause panic' argument is stupid

Some Gibroney: No we are not. We are told to NOT TALK TO THE PRESS FOR ANY REASON, we are instructed to get a name and number and pass that info to our PR department. Maybe you should do your homework before you talk your crap.

The Gibroney Huner: Pigs are required to identify themselves to civilians. If not necessarily by card, then by badge number. Do YOUR homework before spreading your childish propaganda. You talk like you're some kind of expert on mass hysteria, but you and I both know that a shill like you will defend your criminal government/employer to the very end. Why is it so difficult for you to simply admit that the behavior of those federal employees was quite peculiar and just move on from there. No one's saying there's some massive conspiracy here to uncover, just that federal workers are generally much more arrogant and abusive than local and state police. Again, on average.

Also, a great way to cause mass hysteria would be to station the TSA at a public location and offer no explanation to the media whatsoever, thereby leaving the door wide open for rumor spreading and gossip on perhaps less reliable media outlets. Wouldn't it have made more sense to simply lie to the guy, rather than zip your lips shut and let him assume the worst? It would've been as simple as this: "Sir, this is a routine safety precaution, I really don't have much more information than that but i can direct you... " See? Mission accomplished. In fact, this is the squirrely way in which the Federal government would usually handle this sort of situation, judging by news reports. Countless times I've heard an initial explanation, immediately contradicted by a more detailed later explanation of an event. So this would not be unprecedented. There ya go. "mass hysteria" argument destroyed.