Why can't we stop using cunty terms like no-planer, and truther? That's another good question, but today let's focus on why the "mainstream" of the 9/11 truth movement so vehemently resists any open discussion of the possibility that the images we were spoonfed from the military industrial media complex that day could have been digitally manipulated.
I follow the rule that one shouldn't speak with absolute certainty unless one is absolutely certain. So I'll say what I'm certain of. I'm certain that much of the evidence presented by these mysterious "no-planers" is very compelling indeed. I'm equally certain of how repellent I find the instinctively closed-minded response of most of the 9/11 truth "establishment" regarding this issue.
I sometimes need to pause and remind myself of how truly inappropriate and unwelcome our "conspiracy theorist" title is. I was simply pursuing reliable information and genuine knowledge, and Conspiracy Theorist is the condescending title I ended up with. (Apparently, the irony is completely lost on these twits, that if there were no conspiracy theorists, no crimes would ever be solved, since the entire essence of law enforcement consists of theorizing about how, when, where, and why a suspect conspired to commit a crime.) It's precisely this kind of narrow-minded labeling, and dismissal that helped turn me off to the mainstream media, and attract me to the truth movement to begin with. And it dismays me to see people within the movement act like kool aid drinkers themselves by declaring certain things taboo. Our time here is too short to worry about taboos. That's what a Gibroney would do.
Monday, August 31, 2009
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Gibroney Of The Week: Green Day
Never before in the history of modern music has there been a collection of hypocritical assholes quite so abrasively annoying, or utterly soul-raping as green day. When I hear Green Day's music, I'm truly flabbergasted by just how well their particular brand of Pussy-Punk is marketed to the nearly retarded. The most depressing part of it all is the fact that they're probably not even aware of what raging hypocrites they are.
They're even hypocritical in the sonic sense. Their musical style is mostly lifted from Bad Religion. Even if they could write music that was good, or even tolerable, there's still the issue of their whore-punk, do-anything-for-a-buck mentality. What makes Green Day so much more damaging than the typical sellout rock band, like U2 or Aerosmith, is the fact that they specifically attempt to sell this perverse form of well-confined rebellion while doing things like having their audience hold up their cell phone display screens, rather than lighters during a show.
Now maybe some of you bitch-made Gibroneys from this generation are okay with that, but I'm from the 90's and I'm here to tell you, that it's definitely not cool. I know that for quite some time now, it's been hip for bands to sellout but for Christ's sake, do you need to involve the audience in it? Do you need us to feel as degraded as you do? Seriously, fuck Green Day.
They're even hypocritical in the sonic sense. Their musical style is mostly lifted from Bad Religion. Even if they could write music that was good, or even tolerable, there's still the issue of their whore-punk, do-anything-for-a-buck mentality. What makes Green Day so much more damaging than the typical sellout rock band, like U2 or Aerosmith, is the fact that they specifically attempt to sell this perverse form of well-confined rebellion while doing things like having their audience hold up their cell phone display screens, rather than lighters during a show.
Now maybe some of you bitch-made Gibroneys from this generation are okay with that, but I'm from the 90's and I'm here to tell you, that it's definitely not cool. I know that for quite some time now, it's been hip for bands to sellout but for Christ's sake, do you need to involve the audience in it? Do you need us to feel as degraded as you do? Seriously, fuck Green Day.
Thursday, August 6, 2009
Was Flight 93 Meant For Building 7?
It's striking how neatly tied together this crime would have been, were this to have occurred. Clearly, two of the very weakest aspects of the federal government's story are their explanation of building 7's collapse and that smoldering hole in Shanksville, into which an airliner supposedly disappeared. And these are precisely the loose ends that would have been tied together if flight 93 would have hit WTC 7, which I believe was probably the globalists' plan.
Not only would this have taken care of that embarrassing Pennsylvania thing, it would've also provided spectacular (and much more believable) footage of planes leveling buildings in New York. Perhaps this was meant to be the main focus of media attention, rather than the obviously demolished towers. Sure would've made the growth of the now unstoppable Truth Movement a lot harder, wouldn't it? Just some healthy speculation for ya. Anyway, here's Dr. Tarpley discussing the possibility that 9/11 was more than a typical false flag attack, but rather a comprehensive coup attempt.
Not only would this have taken care of that embarrassing Pennsylvania thing, it would've also provided spectacular (and much more believable) footage of planes leveling buildings in New York. Perhaps this was meant to be the main focus of media attention, rather than the obviously demolished towers. Sure would've made the growth of the now unstoppable Truth Movement a lot harder, wouldn't it? Just some healthy speculation for ya. Anyway, here's Dr. Tarpley discussing the possibility that 9/11 was more than a typical false flag attack, but rather a comprehensive coup attempt.
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Gibroney Of The Week: The Anti-Defamation League
This whore of a hate group is the first line of defense for Globalist scumbags. Far from being a protective organization for the Jewish people, this sellout organization has become a very effective bulldog for the Illuminati. Any discussion of Zionism and its role within the global power structure is likely to get you labeled an antisemite. The Anti-Defamation League assaults the good name of Jewish people everywhere, just as the 9/11 lie does the same for Muslims.
David Icke is consistently harassed by these propagandists. Despite the complete absence of any evidence whatsoever, the ADL accuses him of racism and openly attempts to censor him from the media. They offer no angry quotes from Icke. No questionable personal relationships with extremists. Just vague villification and the baseless assertion that when Icke talks about his 'reptilians' he's actually talking about Jews, wink wink. Shameful nonsense.
I don't have much to say regarding fourth dimensional reptilian beings, but I'll tell you this. If you have the ADL on your nuts, then you must be talking something close to truth. It's interesting to consider the similarities between the Anti-Defamation League and Al Qaeda. They're both essentially fake and only in existence to serve the agenda of their Globalist puppeteers.
Monday, July 13, 2009
Fuck you, John Yoo
John Yoo is a professor at Berkely, and a former Department Of Justice official. He is also a dirtbag. His legal analysis, and his legal analysis alone, was the Bush Administration's justification for both torture and domestic wiretapping. One guy's opinion was used to allow tyrants to torture children in front of parents with impunity, all under the guise of catching "terrists" who don't really exist and never really attacked us in the first place.
No second opinion. No scrutiny from congress. Just a disingenuous legal analysis that would later be admonished by the Justice Department. Admonished because of the obvious impropriety of basing an entire nation's foreign policy on the puppet opinion of one spiritless, souldead lawyer. But not admonished by the public. No, certainly not. Not when there's all these sports n' beers to attend to. Sports n' beers. Beers n' sports. Beers n' sports. Sports n' beers. Get over it, debt cattle.
Really, the term "coincidence theorist" does a great job of describing the average American. There seems to be no limit to how many checks they will mark in the "coincidence" column, when it comes to everything that's happened to us since 9/11/01. The truth is, much has happened. And that story hasn't really even begun to be told.
No second opinion. No scrutiny from congress. Just a disingenuous legal analysis that would later be admonished by the Justice Department. Admonished because of the obvious impropriety of basing an entire nation's foreign policy on the puppet opinion of one spiritless, souldead lawyer. But not admonished by the public. No, certainly not. Not when there's all these sports n' beers to attend to. Sports n' beers. Beers n' sports. Beers n' sports. Sports n' beers. Get over it, debt cattle.
Really, the term "coincidence theorist" does a great job of describing the average American. There seems to be no limit to how many checks they will mark in the "coincidence" column, when it comes to everything that's happened to us since 9/11/01. The truth is, much has happened. And that story hasn't really even begun to be told.
Friday, July 3, 2009
If You're in the Military, You're a Hired Killer
Simple as that. If you really wanted to go to college, so you decided it'd be okay to shoot some women and babies in the back, then you're a murderer. Sure, there are tons of ways for you to deny that truth, but it's still the truth. No matter how many obnoxious parades, or phony reasons for war they provide you with, you still know that what you did wasn't heroic. Or good. Or right. Or maybe you don't know, which is even scarier. Maybe once you've killed for the New World Order, there's no turning back. Maybe traumatizing people with their own actions is a very effective form of mind control.
David Icke explains that there's really no such thing as war, in a certain sense. He uses the example of WWII. There was intense conflict between Germany and the Soviet Union, one supposedly right wing and fascist. The other supposedly leftist and communist. But when one examines the two societies, it becomes apparent that they were more similar than distinctive. Both were dictatorial police states who held victims in concentration camps. So the real struggle, the truly epic battle being fought by our species isn't between any two armies, but between the people who have fallen for war and the people who have not. Here's a tip: If you find yourself in a funny looking outfit, aiming heavy weaponry in a foreign country that's much poorer than your own, then you've been had. You've allowed yourself to become a monster on their behalf.
Although every one of the current rationales for war are utterly false, I do understand how one could fall victim to them. After all, who doesn't want to defend their homeland, and stand ready to protect the Republic, which has provided us with so many precious freedoms? But what passes for war right now isn't really war. It's an outmoded survival mechanism that has been kept on life support by the ruling elite, because they've long since understood that it was the single best tool for the manipulation of the human animal. At least until television.
It goes like this. War probably evolved naturally among us (although many would disagree). War escalates as the victors become better at exploiting the ensuing power vacuum. During this process the amount of motivations and justifications for war that would arise naturally due to cultural conflicts, etc, decrease and the amount of fabricated and disingenuous justifications increase. As power consolidates almost to the point of being singular, we begin to see such affronts to our intelligence and conscience as 9/11.
David Icke explains that there's really no such thing as war, in a certain sense. He uses the example of WWII. There was intense conflict between Germany and the Soviet Union, one supposedly right wing and fascist. The other supposedly leftist and communist. But when one examines the two societies, it becomes apparent that they were more similar than distinctive. Both were dictatorial police states who held victims in concentration camps. So the real struggle, the truly epic battle being fought by our species isn't between any two armies, but between the people who have fallen for war and the people who have not. Here's a tip: If you find yourself in a funny looking outfit, aiming heavy weaponry in a foreign country that's much poorer than your own, then you've been had. You've allowed yourself to become a monster on their behalf.
Although every one of the current rationales for war are utterly false, I do understand how one could fall victim to them. After all, who doesn't want to defend their homeland, and stand ready to protect the Republic, which has provided us with so many precious freedoms? But what passes for war right now isn't really war. It's an outmoded survival mechanism that has been kept on life support by the ruling elite, because they've long since understood that it was the single best tool for the manipulation of the human animal. At least until television.
It goes like this. War probably evolved naturally among us (although many would disagree). War escalates as the victors become better at exploiting the ensuing power vacuum. During this process the amount of motivations and justifications for war that would arise naturally due to cultural conflicts, etc, decrease and the amount of fabricated and disingenuous justifications increase. As power consolidates almost to the point of being singular, we begin to see such affronts to our intelligence and conscience as 9/11.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
